Last month I caught this Reuters story about Harrold, Texas schoolteachers gaining district approval to carry guns in school. At the time, I was too busy getting my own son ready for 1st grade to blog it but I bookmarked the story because it was waaaay too good to let slip by without comment.
Clearly I wasn’t alone.
In late August The New York Times carried this story on Harrold’s new “teachers with guns” measure.
Here’s the thing: Harrold is a small, “impoverished” town characterized by “grain silos”. The high school in question has a student population of 100 and employs two dozen teachers.
From what I could gather, there hasn’t been a problem with violent incidents in the school in the past but the proposal was put forth as a preemptive measure:
In the center of the storm is (school superintendent…sf) Mr. Thweatt, a man who describes himself as “a contingency planner,” who believes Americans should be less afraid of protecting themselves and who thinks signs at schools saying “gun-free zone” make them targets for armed attacks.
Mr. Thweatt maintains that having teachers carry guns is a rational response to a real threat. The county sheriff’s office is 17 miles away, he argues, and the district cannot afford to hire police officers, as urban schools in Dallas and Houston do.
Umm, okay. But if, as the NY Times article sites, the idea is to ward off a Columbine-esque repeat…Columbine happened nearly a decade ago. What took Harrold’s town-folk so long?
“Our people just don’t want their children to be fish in a bowl,” said David Thweatt, the schools superintendent and driving force behind the policy. “Country people are take-care-of-yourself people. They are not under the illusion that the police are there to protect them.”
Hmmm…now where else have I heard that rationale? Oh yeah. Within other small towns, communities and insular religious groups adopting a “we’ll keep this silent and in the family” approach to problem solving.
And specifically, speaking of Columbine, I also heard that same rationale nearly a decade ago while producing a post-Columbine story on Youth & Guns in America for German network television.
Living in the U.S. at the time, I traveled to L.A. for pre-production work that included visiting gang members in South Central projects, driving around Watts with an ex-Crips member, touring an NRA range and attending a weapons and gun exhibition.
I was a woman working on my own and risks were inherent but most of the week was spent listening to a lot of superfluous talk and a lot of rhetoric. More followed during production week when I returned to L.A. to join my German colleagues in filming all of the above plus night sortees with the LAPD.
I got an earful of the “right to bear arms” and “guns don’t kill people; people kill people” credos.
Funny that because at the same time, the ex-gang bangers were on a crusade to get the younger generation to put down their weapons and duke it out hand to hand. “Old school style” they said. They seemed to understand that guns, indeed, DO kill people.
Of the above, guess which group genuinely sent chills down my spine? Hint: The one with loads of $$ and a strong U.S. government lobby…
Let’s hope none of Harrold’s teachers gets his or her britches in a twist over an incomplete homework assignment.